Writer did an excellent job on completing the discussion board assignment questions in a timely manner and the revising. I will be hiring this writer for future assignments.
Click the link above to respond to the discussion. If you need help with completing discussions please click here for more information.
“Distributions to Shareholders” Please respond to the following:
From the e-Activity, contrast the differences between a stock dividend and a stock split. Imagine that you are a stockholder in a company. Determine whether you would prefer to see the company that you researched declare a 100% stock dividend or declare a 2-for-1 split. Provide support for your answer with one (1) real-world example of your preference.
This week DB(s) revolve around stock dividends and stock splits and the feasibility of the two. Thus, essentially, what is asked is whether or not a 2-1 stock split can benefit parties involved or stakeholders. However, the best method of determining this question, is defining the difference between a stock split, and a dividend.
Stock split – Investopedia, an online database for the collection of financial connotations defines as stock split as, “acorporate action in which a company divides its existing shares into multiple shares. Although the number of shares outstanding increases by a specific multiple, the total dollar value of the shares remains the same compared to pre-split amounts, because the split did not add any real value.”
The company that I researched, Coca Cola, announced in July 2012, that they would be undergoing a 2-1 stock split, Coca-Cola competes in an industry (the Carbonated Soft Drink – CSD, or Non-Alcoholic Beverage – NAB) in which it is profitable for a firm to accept the risk of such an endeavor as splitting the shares prices can actually benefit the firm by attracting investors to a brand that has been in existence for over a century. In my opinion, because of the completion in the market place, and Coca-Cola’s proven track record or, past performance, this endeavor would ultimately mean that more investors would by into the conglomerate. Of course this was safe and beneficial to Coke. However, for a company in a different industry who’s past performance or brand does not warrant such an action, this may not even be a consideration. Not only can a split erode the price of stocks, but the firm’s credibility and image can be severely damaged, as such a split could be viewed as an act of desperation. As stated in the aforementioned a market analysis is needed prior to this type of action taking place. Thus, Coke’s actions were appropriate by my analysis.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more